Pick the right agreement. Get the most from every contribution.
Two tools for the two hardest parts of standing up a research partnership: choosing between an MTA, DUA, RCA, or CRADA — and knowing how to work with the fourteen distinct roles that show up once the ink is dry.
Agreement Navigator
A five-question guided wizard that walks the nature of exchange, proprietary status, funding, IP control, and institutional context to a recommended MTA, DUA, RCA, or CRADA — with party roles, legal risks, and contextual watch-outs on the result.
Open the navigator Route · /rolesRoles & Group Dynamics
Fourteen contributor roles across every agreement type — Provider through Trainee — each with its real burden, what actually motivates it, and the fastest lever to get the most out of it in a working group.
Open the playbook Route · /compareCompare Instruments
CONA, Collaboration Agreement, CRADA, Two-Way MTA, and DUA/DTUA side by side — purpose, parties, resource flow, IP, duration, and complexity, with instruments you can toggle on or off.
Open the matrix Route · /seedsSeeds
Save everything you've built on this visit — your Navigator result, role map, comparisons, and Ramp drafts — in one export. Plus every seed prompt behind the toolkit and the open questions still worth chasing.
Save your seedsFour instruments, one decision
The Navigator resolves these down to one recommendation based on what's actually being exchanged and who's involved.